GALATEA - Dominik Budzowski: PeeringDB fix list

AS52106 · peeringdb.com/net/11857

PeeringDB

3 things to fix in GALATEA - Dominik Budzowski's PeeringDB record, from what its exchanges publish: 3 to correct. As of 2026-10-08 20:58 UTC.

Make the changes on GALATEA - Dominik Budzowski's PeeringDB page: sign in, choose Edit, and find the exchanges under Public Peering Exchange Points. Speeds go in as megabits per second.

Correct these entries (3)

Addresses or port speeds in PeeringDB that differ from the exchange's IX-F export. The changes below follow the export; if the export is the one that's wrong, tell the exchange instead.

  1. Poland EPIX.Katowice Katowice/Silesia, Poland · PeeringDB 491
    ProblemPeeringDB hasThe export has
    IPv6 address missing from PeeringDBnone2001:7f8:5b::169
    • In the entry with IPv4 178.216.40.169: set IPv6 to 2001:7f8:5b::169 (now empty).

    PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange, so PeeringDB also suggests this change on the network's PeeringDB page.

  2. Poland EPIX.Warszawa Warsaw, Poland · PeeringDB 474
    ProblemPeeringDB hasThe export has
    IPv4 address missing from PeeringDB89.46.144.15689.46.144.156 89.46.144.202
    IPv6 address missing from PeeringDBnone2001:678:3ac::156 2001:678:3ac::202
    Port speed differs10G2 × 20G
    • In the entry with IPv4 89.46.144.156: set IPv6 to 2001:678:3ac::156 (now empty); set Speed to 20000 (20G) (now 10000).
    • Add an entry: IPv4 89.46.144.202, IPv6 2001:678:3ac::202, speed 20000 (20G), RS peer yes.

    PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange, so PeeringDB also suggests this change on the network's PeeringDB page.

  3. Poland TPIX PL Warsaw, Poland · PeeringDB 482
    ProblemPeeringDB hasThe export has
    IPv6 address missing from PeeringDBnone2001:7f8:27::5:2106:1 2001:7f8:27::5:2106:2
    • In the entry with IPv4 195.149.233.178: set IPv6 to 2001:7f8:27::5:2106:1 (now empty).
    • In the entry with IPv4 195.149.233.179: set IPv6 to 2001:7f8:27::5:2106:2 (now empty).

    PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange, so PeeringDB also suggests this change on the network's PeeringDB page.

From ixreport.com/net/52106/: PeeringDB against each exchange's IX-F export and website members list. Exchanges whose lists couldn't be read on this update aren't included.