ixreport

Centralny Osrodek Informatyki Gornictwa S.A. - COIG: PeeringDB fix list

AS28978 · peeringdb.com/net/6578

PeeringDB

3 things to fix in Centralny Osrodek Informatyki Gornictwa S.A. - COIG's PeeringDB record, from what its exchanges publish: 2 to add, 1 to correct. As of 2026-10-08 18:53 UTC.

Make the changes on Centralny Osrodek Informatyki Gornictwa S.A. - COIG's PeeringDB page: sign in, choose Edit, and find the exchanges under Public Peering Exchange Points. Speeds go in as megabits per second.

Add these exchanges (2)

On the exchange's own member list, but not in Centralny Osrodek Informatyki Gornictwa S.A. - COIG's PeeringDB record. Add one entry per connection with these values.

  1. Czechia NIX.CZ Prague, Czechia · PeeringDB 71From its IX-F export and website members list
    IPv491.210.16.55
    IPv62001:7f8:14::39:1
    Speed200 Mbps (200M)
    RS peerYes

    PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange, so PeeringDB also suggests this change on the network's PeeringDB page.

  2. Poland TPIX PL Warsaw, Poland · PeeringDB 482From its IX-F export and website members list
    IPv4195.149.232.137
    IPv62001:7f8:27::2:8978:1
    SpeedNot published
    RS peerNot published

    PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange, so PeeringDB also suggests this change on the network's PeeringDB page.

Correct these entries (1)

Addresses or port speeds in PeeringDB that differ from the exchange's IX-F export. The changes below follow the export; if the export is the one that's wrong, tell the exchange instead.

  1. Poland EPIX.Katowice Katowice/Silesia, Poland · PeeringDB 491
    ProblemPeeringDB hasThe export has
    IPv4 address missing from PeeringDB178.216.40.109178.216.40.109 178.216.40.172
    IPv6 address missing from PeeringDB2001:7f8:5b::1092001:7f8:5b::109 2001:7f8:5b::172
    Port speed differs10G10G + 1G
    • Add an entry: IPv4 178.216.40.172, IPv6 2001:7f8:5b::172, speed 1000 (1G), RS peer yes.

    PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange, so PeeringDB also suggests this change on the network's PeeringDB page.

From ixreport.com/net/28978/: PeeringDB against each exchange's IX-F export and website members list. Exchanges whose lists couldn't be read on this update aren't included.