ixreport

Qwilt: PeeringDB fix list

AS20253 · peeringdb.com/net/27326

PeeringDB

6 things to fix in Qwilt's PeeringDB record, from what its exchanges publish: 6 to add. As of 2026-10-08 21:56 UTC.

Make the changes on Qwilt's PeeringDB page: sign in, choose Edit, and find the exchanges under Public Peering Exchange Points. Speeds go in as megabits per second.

Add these exchanges (6)

On the exchange's own member list, but not in Qwilt's PeeringDB record. Add one entry per connection with these values.

  1. Brazil IX.br (PTT.br) Fortaleza Fortaleza/CE, Brazil · PeeringDB 710From its website members list

    The exchange's website members list doesn't give addresses or a speed. Use the addresses on your router, or ask the exchange.

  2. Brazil IX.br (PTT.br) Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brazil · PeeringDB 177From its website members list

    The exchange's website members list doesn't give addresses or a speed. Use the addresses on your router, or ask the exchange.

  3. Brazil IX.br (PTT.br) São Paulo São Paulo/SP, Brazil · PeeringDB 171From its website members list

    The exchange's website members list doesn't give addresses or a speed. Use the addresses on your router, or ask the exchange.

  4. United States MASS-IX Boston, United States · PeeringDB 1086From its IX-F export and website members list
    IPv4206.53.143.54
    IPv62001:504:47::4f1d:0:1
    Speed100000 Mbps (100G)
    RS peerYes
  5. United States SIX Seattle Seattle, United States · PeeringDB 13From its IX-F export and website members list
    IPv4206.81.81.195
    IPv62001:504:16::4f1d
    SpeedNot published
    RS peerNot published

    PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange, so PeeringDB also suggests this change on the network's PeeringDB page.

  6. United States SLIX - Salt Lake City Internet Exchange Salt Lake City, United States · PeeringDB 829From its IX-F export and website members list
    IPv4149.112.13.52
    IPv62001:504:105::52
    Speed100000 Mbps (100G)
    RS peerYes

    PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange, so PeeringDB also suggests this change on the network's PeeringDB page.

From ixreport.com/net/20253/: PeeringDB against each exchange's IX-F export and website members list. Exchanges whose lists couldn't be read on this update aren't included.