ixreport

DIGI RO: PeeringDB fix list

AS8708 · peeringdb.com/net/110

PeeringDB

3 things to fix in DIGI RO's PeeringDB record, from what its exchanges publish: 2 to add, 1 to correct. As of 2026-10-08 18:53 UTC.

Make the changes on DIGI RO's PeeringDB page: sign in, choose Edit, and find the exchanges under Public Peering Exchange Points. Speeds go in as megabits per second.

Add these exchanges (2)

On the exchange's own member list, but not in DIGI RO's PeeringDB record. Add one entry per connection with these values.

  1. Belgium BNIX Brussels, Belgium · PeeringDB 59From its website members list
    IPv4194.53.172.114 194.53.172.119
    IPv62001:7f8:26::a500:8708:1 2001:7f8:26::a500:8708:2
    SpeedNot published
    RS peerNot published

    The exchange lists several addresses but not which go together: add one entry for each IPv4 and IPv6 pair.

  2. Germany DE-CIX Frankfurt Frankfurt, Germany · PeeringDB 31From its IX-F export and website members list

    2 connections, so 2 entries:

    IPv480.81.192.87
    IPv62001:7f8::2204:0:1
    Speed200000 Mbps (200G)
    RS peerYes
    IPv480.81.197.4
    IPv62001:7f8::2204:0:2
    Speed200000 Mbps (200G)
    RS peerYes

Correct these entries (1)

Addresses or port speeds in PeeringDB that differ from the exchange's IX-F export. The changes below follow the export; if the export is the one that's wrong, tell the exchange instead.

  1. Germany DE-CIX Frankfurt Frankfurt, Germany · PeeringDB 31
    ProblemPeeringDB hasThe export has
    Address belongs to another network in PeeringDB80.81.192.87 is AS6910 DIGI BORDER80.81.192.87
    Address belongs to another network in PeeringDB80.81.197.4 is AS6910 DIGI BORDER80.81.197.4
    Address belongs to another network in PeeringDB2001:7f8::2204:0:1 is AS6910 DIGI BORDER2001:7f8::2204:0:1
    Address belongs to another network in PeeringDB2001:7f8::2204:0:2 is AS6910 DIGI BORDER2001:7f8::2204:0:2

    An address another network has in PeeringDB isn't suggested here: either that network's entry or the exchange's export is wrong. Ask the exchange which.

From ixreport.com/net/8708/: PeeringDB against each exchange's IX-F export and website members list. Exchanges whose lists couldn't be read on this update aren't included.