CRELCOM: PeeringDB fix list
AS6789 · peeringdb.com/net/3757
3 things to fix in CRELCOM's PeeringDB record, from what its exchanges publish: 3 to correct. As of 2026-10-08 18:53 UTC.
Make the changes on CRELCOM's PeeringDB page: sign in, choose Edit, and find the exchanges under Public Peering Exchange Points. Speeds go in as megabits per second.
Correct these entries (3)
Addresses or port speeds in PeeringDB that differ from the exchange's IX-F export. The changes below follow the export; if the export is the one that's wrong, tell the exchange instead.
-
Problem PeeringDB has The export has IPv4 address missing from PeeringDB 178.18.226.196 178.18.225.54 178.18.226.196 IPv6 address missing from PeeringDB 2a03:5f80:4::226:196 2a03:5f80:4::225:54 2a03:5f80:4::226:196 Port speed differs 200G 10G - In the entry with IPv4 178.18.226.196: set Speed to 10000 (10G) (now 200000).
- Add an entry: IPv4 178.18.225.54, IPv6 2a03:5f80:4::225:54, speed 10000 (10G), RS peer yes.
PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange, so PeeringDB also suggests this change on the network's PeeringDB page.
-
Problem PeeringDB has The export has IPv4 address missing from PeeringDB 195.208.210.127 195.208.209.29 195.208.210.127 195.208.210.161 195.208.210.164 IPv6 address missing from PeeringDB 2001:7f8:20:101::210:127 2001:7f8:20:101::209:29 2001:7f8:20:101::210:127 - Add an entry: IPv4 195.208.210.164, IPv6 –, RS peer yes.
- Add an entry: IPv4 195.208.210.161, IPv6 –, RS peer yes.
- Add an entry: IPv4 195.208.209.29, IPv6 2001:7f8:20:101::209:29, RS peer yes.
PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange, so PeeringDB also suggests this change on the network's PeeringDB page.
-
Problem PeeringDB has The export has IPv4 address missing from PeeringDB 193.232.140.49 193.232.140.49 193.232.140.60 IPv6 address missing from PeeringDB none 2001:7f8:20:501::140:49 2001:7f8:20:501::140:60 - In the entry with IPv4 193.232.140.49: set IPv6 to 2001:7f8:20:501::140:49 (now empty).
- Add an entry: IPv4 193.232.140.60, IPv6 2001:7f8:20:501::140:60, RS peer yes.
PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange, so PeeringDB also suggests this change on the network's PeeringDB page.
From ixreport.com/net/6789/: PeeringDB against each exchange's IX-F export and website members list. Exchanges whose lists couldn't be read on this update aren't included.