UARNet: PeeringDB fix list

AS3255 · peeringdb.com/net/2095

PeeringDB

4 things to fix in UARNet's PeeringDB record, from what its exchanges publish: 3 to add, 1 to correct. As of 2026-10-08 20:58 UTC.

Make the changes on UARNet's PeeringDB page: sign in, choose Edit, and find the exchanges under Public Peering Exchange Points. Speeds go in as megabits per second.

Add these exchanges (3)

On the exchange's own member list, but not in UARNet's PeeringDB record. Add one entry per connection with these values.

  1. Netherlands ERA-IX Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands · PeeringDB 3789From its IX-F export and website members list
    IPv4185.1.240.223
    IPv62001:7f8:12a::223
    Speed10000 Mbps (10G)
    RS peerYes

    PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange, so PeeringDB also suggests this change on the network's PeeringDB page.

  2. Germany ERA-IX Frankfurt Frankfurt, Germany · PeeringDB 4630From its IX-F export and website members list
    IPv4185.0.27.96
    IPv62001:7f8:15e::96
    Speed10000 Mbps (10G)
    RS peerYes

    PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange, so PeeringDB also suggests this change on the network's PeeringDB page.

  3. Netherlands GNM-IX Amsterdam, Netherlands · PeeringDB 358From its IX-F export

    The exchange's IX-F export doesn't give addresses or a speed. Use the addresses on your router, or ask the exchange.

    PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange, so PeeringDB also suggests this change on the network's PeeringDB page.

Correct these entries (1)

Addresses or port speeds in PeeringDB that differ from the exchange's IX-F export. The changes below follow the export; if the export is the one that's wrong, tell the exchange instead.

  1. Poland EPIX.Warszawa Warsaw, Poland · PeeringDB 474
    ProblemPeeringDB hasThe export has
    IPv6 address missing from PeeringDBnone2001:678:3ac::129
    Port speed differs10G100G
    • In the entry with IPv4 89.46.144.129: set IPv6 to 2001:678:3ac::129 (now empty); set Speed to 100000 (100G) (now 10000).

    PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange, so PeeringDB also suggests this change on the network's PeeringDB page.

From ixreport.com/net/3255/: PeeringDB against each exchange's IX-F export and website members list. Exchanges whose lists couldn't be read on this update aren't included.