ixreport

Druifje: PeeringDB fix list

AS215216 · peeringdb.com/net/35747

PeeringDB

4 things to fix in Druifje's PeeringDB record, from what its exchanges publish: 2 to add, 2 to correct. As of 2026-10-08 18:53 UTC.

Make the changes on Druifje's PeeringDB page: sign in, choose Edit, and find the exchanges under Public Peering Exchange Points. Speeds go in as megabits per second.

Add these exchanges (2)

On the exchange's own member list, but not in Druifje's PeeringDB record. Add one entry per connection with these values.

  1. Switzerland 4b42 Internet Exchange Point Zurich, Switzerland · PeeringDB 2447From its IX-F export and website members list
    IPv4–
    IPv62001:7f8:d0::3:48b0:1
    SpeedNot published
    RS peerYes
  2. Netherlands ERA-IX Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands · PeeringDB 3789From its website members list

    The exchange's website members list doesn't give addresses or a speed. Use the addresses on your router, or ask the exchange.

Correct these entries (2)

Addresses or port speeds in PeeringDB that differ from the exchange's IX-F export. The changes below follow the export; if the export is the one that's wrong, tell the exchange instead.

  1. Germany ERA-IX Frankfurt Frankfurt, Germany · PeeringDB 4630
    ProblemPeeringDB hasThe export has
    IPv4 address missing from PeeringDBnone185.0.27.61
    • In the entry with IPv6 2001:7f8:15e::61: set IPv4 to 185.0.27.61 (now empty).

    PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange and this network allows automatic updates, so PeeringDB should make this change by itself. If it hasn't, PeeringDB may have hit a conflict: check the IX-F suggestions on the network's PeeringDB page.

  2. Germany FogIXP Frankfurt Frankfurt, Germany · PeeringDB 4200
    ProblemPeeringDB hasThe export has
    IPv4 address missing from PeeringDBnone185.0.30.66
    • In the entry with IPv6 2001:7f8:11c:1:0:21:5216:1: set IPv4 to 185.0.30.66 (now empty).

    PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange and this network allows automatic updates, so PeeringDB should make this change by itself. If it hasn't, PeeringDB may have hit a conflict: check the IX-F suggestions on the network's PeeringDB page.

From ixreport.com/net/215216/: PeeringDB against each exchange's IX-F export and website members list. Exchanges whose lists couldn't be read on this update aren't included.