Ursin Filli: PeeringDB fix list
AS202427 · peeringdb.com/net/31573
5 things to fix in Ursin Filli's PeeringDB record, from what its exchanges publish: 2 to add, 3 to correct. As of 2026-10-08 20:58 UTC.
Make the changes on Ursin Filli's PeeringDB page: sign in, choose Edit, and find the exchanges under Public Peering Exchange Points. Speeds go in as megabits per second.
Add these exchanges (2)
On the exchange's own member list, but not in Ursin Filli's PeeringDB record. Add one entry per connection with these values.
-
4b42 Internet Exchange Point Zurich, Switzerland · PeeringDB 2447From its IX-F export and website members listIPv4 – IPv6 2001:7f8:d0::3:16bb:1 Speed Not published RS peer Yes -
UNM-Exch Canada-West Vancouver, Canada · PeeringDB 2452From its IX-F export and website members list2 connections, so 2 entries:
IPv4 192.34.27.97 IPv6 – Speed Not published RS peer Not published IPv4 – IPv6 2602:ffb1:200:0:192:34:27:97 Speed Not published RS peer Not published PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange, so PeeringDB also suggests this change on the network's PeeringDB page.
Correct these entries (3)
Addresses or port speeds in PeeringDB that differ from the exchange's IX-F export. The changes below follow the export; if the export is the one that's wrong, tell the exchange instead.
-
Problem PeeringDB has The export has IPv4 address missing from PeeringDB none 185.1.147.168 - In the entry with IPv6 2001:7f8:ca:1::168: set IPv4 to 185.1.147.168 (now empty).
PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange, so PeeringDB also suggests this change on the network's PeeringDB page.
-
Problem PeeringDB has The export has Port speed differs 1G 10G - In the entry with IPv6 2001:7f8:10f::3:16bb:205: set Speed to 10000 (10G) (now 1000).
PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange, so PeeringDB also suggests this change on the network's PeeringDB page.
-
Problem PeeringDB has The export has Port speed differs 1G 10G - In the entry with IPv4 185.1.184.43: set Speed to 10000 (10G) (now 1000).
PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange, so PeeringDB also suggests this change on the network's PeeringDB page.
From ixreport.com/net/202427/: PeeringDB against each exchange's IX-F export and website members list. Exchanges whose lists couldn't be read on this update aren't included.