Omega Telecom: PeeringDB fix list

AS199995 · peeringdb.com/net/13892

PeeringDB

5 things to fix in Omega Telecom's PeeringDB record, from what its exchanges publish: 1 to add, 4 to correct. As of 2026-10-08 20:58 UTC.

Make the changes on Omega Telecom's PeeringDB page: sign in, choose Edit, and find the exchanges under Public Peering Exchange Points. Speeds go in as megabits per second.

Add these exchanges (1)

On the exchange's own member list, but not in Omega Telecom's PeeringDB record. Add one entry per connection with these values.

  1. Netherlands LSIX Amsterdam, The Hague, Rotterdam, Naaldwijk, Netherlands · PeeringDB 1308From its website members list
    IPv4185.1.32.134
    IPv62001:7f8:8f::a519:9995:1
    SpeedNot published
    RS peerNot published

Correct these entries (4)

Addresses or port speeds in PeeringDB that differ from the exchange's IX-F export. The changes below follow the export; if the export is the one that's wrong, tell the exchange instead.

  1. Germany DE-CIX Frankfurt Frankfurt, Germany · PeeringDB 31
    ProblemPeeringDB hasThe export has
    Port speed differs40G400G
    • In the entry with IPv4 80.81.197.107: set Speed to 400000 (400G) (now 40000).
  2. Netherlands GNM-IX Amsterdam, Netherlands · PeeringDB 358
    ProblemPeeringDB hasThe export has
    Port speed differs10G40G + 10G

    PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange and this network allows automatic updates, so PeeringDB should make this change by itself. If it hasn't, PeeringDB may have hit a conflict: check the IX-F suggestions on the network's PeeringDB page.

  3. United Kingdom LINX LON1 London, United Kingdom · PeeringDB 18
    ProblemPeeringDB hasThe export has
    Port speed differs1G5G
    • In the entry with IPv4 195.66.228.87: set Speed to 5000 (5G) (now 1000).
  4. Czechia Peering.cz Prague, Bratislava, Vienna, Frankfurt, Czechia · PeeringDB 713
    ProblemPeeringDB hasThe export has
    Port speed differs100G12.5G
    • In the entry with IPv4 185.0.20.149: set Speed to 12500 (12.5G) (now 100000).

From ixreport.com/net/199995/: PeeringDB against each exchange's IX-F export and website members list. Exchanges whose lists couldn't be read on this update aren't included.