TELECOM ARMENIA: PeeringDB fix list

AS12297 · peeringdb.com/net/25374

PeeringDB

4 things to fix in TELECOM ARMENIA's PeeringDB record, from what its exchanges publish: 1 to add, 3 to correct. As of 2026-10-08 21:35 UTC.

Make the changes on TELECOM ARMENIA's PeeringDB page: sign in, choose Edit, and find the exchanges under Public Peering Exchange Points. Speeds go in as megabits per second.

Add these exchanges (1)

On the exchange's own member list, but not in TELECOM ARMENIA's PeeringDB record. Add one entry per connection with these values.

  1. Bulgaria NetIX Sofia, Bulgaria · PeeringDB 699From its IX-F export and website members list
    IPv4185.1.226.166
    IPv62001:67c:29f0::1:2297:1
    SpeedNot published
    RS peerYes

    PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange, so PeeringDB also suggests this change on the network's PeeringDB page.

Correct these entries (3)

Addresses or port speeds in PeeringDB that differ from the exchange's IX-F export. The changes below follow the export; if the export is the one that's wrong, tell the exchange instead.

  1. Bulgaria B-IX Sofia, Bulgaria · PeeringDB 326
    ProblemPeeringDB hasThe export has
    Port speed differs20G40G
    • In the entry with IPv4 185.1.30.50: set Speed to 40000 (40G) (now 20000).
  2. Germany DE-CIX Frankfurt Frankfurt, Germany · PeeringDB 31
    ProblemPeeringDB hasThe export has
    Port speed differs30G100G
    • In the entry with IPv4 80.81.196.122: set Speed to 100000 (100G) (now 30000).
  3. Netherlands GNM-IX Amsterdam, Netherlands · PeeringDB 358
    ProblemPeeringDB hasThe export has
    IPv4 address missing from PeeringDB178.18.224.20178.18.224.20 178.18.236.73
    IPv6 address missing from PeeringDB2a03:5f80:4::224:202a03:5f80:4::224:20 2a03:5f80:4:2::236:73
    Port speed differs50G2 × 100G
    • In the entry with IPv4 178.18.224.20: set Speed to 100000 (100G) (now 50000).
    • Add an entry: IPv4 178.18.236.73, IPv6 2a03:5f80:4:2::236:73, speed 100000 (100G), RS peer yes.

    PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange, so PeeringDB also suggests this change on the network's PeeringDB page.

From ixreport.com/net/12297/: PeeringDB against each exchange's IX-F export and website members list. Exchanges whose lists couldn't be read on this update aren't included.