ixreport

NCRYPTD: PeeringDB fix list

AS34465

5 things to fix in NCRYPTD's PeeringDB record, from what its exchanges publish: 5 to add. As of 2026-10-08 18:53 UTC.

AS34465 has no PeeringDB record. Create one (register, then request the network for your organisation) before adding these exchanges.

Add these exchanges (5)

On the exchange's own member list, but not in NCRYPTD's PeeringDB record. Add one entry per connection with these values.

  1. Ukraine 1-IX UA Kyiv, Ukraine · PeeringDB 3562From its website members list

    The exchange's website members list doesn't give addresses or a speed. Use the addresses on your router, or ask the exchange.

  2. Netherlands LSIX Amsterdam, The Hague, Rotterdam, Naaldwijk, Netherlands · PeeringDB 1308From its website members list

    The exchange's website members list doesn't give addresses or a speed. Use the addresses on your router, or ask the exchange.

  3. South Africa NAPAfrica IX Cape Town Cape Town, South Africa · PeeringDB 597From its IX-F export

    The exchange's IX-F export doesn't give addresses or a speed. Use the addresses on your router, or ask the exchange.

    PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange, so PeeringDB also suggests this change on the network's PeeringDB page.

  4. South Africa NAPAfrica IX Johannesburg Johannesburg, South Africa · PeeringDB 592From its IX-F export and website members list

    The exchange's IX-F export and website members list doesn't give addresses or a speed. Use the addresses on your router, or ask the exchange.

    PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange, so PeeringDB also suggests this change on the network's PeeringDB page.

  5. Netherlands NL-ix Amsterdam, Rotterdam, Brussels, Luxembourg, Frankfurt, Düsseldorf, Berlin, Dublin, London, Copenhagen, Paris, Marseille, Netherlands · PeeringDB 64From its IX-F export and website members list
    IPv4193.239.118.6
    IPv62001:7f8:13::a503:4465:1
    SpeedNot published
    RS peerYes

    PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange, so PeeringDB also suggests this change on the network's PeeringDB page.

From ixreport.com/net/34465/: PeeringDB against each exchange's IX-F export and website members list. Exchanges whose lists couldn't be read on this update aren't included.