ixreport

ICONIC SERVERS: PeeringDB fix list

AS214271 · peeringdb.com/net/39824

PeeringDB

3 things to fix in ICONIC SERVERS's PeeringDB record, from what its exchanges publish: 3 to correct. As of 2026-10-08 18:53 UTC.

Make the changes on ICONIC SERVERS's PeeringDB page: sign in, choose Edit, and find the exchanges under Public Peering Exchange Points. Speeds go in as megabits per second.

Correct these entries (3)

Addresses or port speeds in PeeringDB that differ from the exchange's IX-F export. The changes below follow the export; if the export is the one that's wrong, tell the exchange instead.

  1. United Kingdom LINX LON1 London, United Kingdom · PeeringDB 18
    ProblemPeeringDB hasThe export has
    IPv6 address missing from PeeringDBnone2001:7f8:4::3:44ff:1
    Port speed differs10G100G
    • In the entry with IPv4 195.66.227.183: set IPv6 to 2001:7f8:4::3:44ff:1 (now empty); set Speed to 100000 (100G) (now 10000).
  2. United Kingdom LONAP London, United Kingdom · PeeringDB 53
    ProblemPeeringDB hasThe export has
    IPv6 address missing from PeeringDBnone2001:7f8:17::3:44ff:1
    • In the entry with IPv4 5.57.82.206: set IPv6 to 2001:7f8:17::3:44ff:1 (now empty).

    PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange and this network allows automatic updates, so PeeringDB should make this change by itself. If it hasn't, PeeringDB may have hit a conflict: check the IX-F suggestions on the network's PeeringDB page.

  3. Netherlands NL-ix Amsterdam, Rotterdam, Brussels, Luxembourg, Frankfurt, Düsseldorf, Berlin, Dublin, London, Copenhagen, Paris, Marseille, Netherlands · PeeringDB 64
    ProblemPeeringDB hasThe export has
    IPv6 address missing from PeeringDBnone2001:7f8:13::a521:4271:1 2001:7f8:13::a521:4271:2
    • In the entry with IPv4 193.239.116.11: set IPv6 to 2001:7f8:13::a521:4271:2 (now empty).
    • In the entry with IPv4 193.239.116.43: set IPv6 to 2001:7f8:13::a521:4271:1 (now empty).

    PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange and this network allows automatic updates, so PeeringDB should make this change by itself. If it hasn't, PeeringDB may have hit a conflict: check the IX-F suggestions on the network's PeeringDB page.

From ixreport.com/net/214271/: PeeringDB against each exchange's IX-F export and website members list. Exchanges whose lists couldn't be read on this update aren't included.