CMIS: PeeringDB fix list
AS204949 · peeringdb.com/net/40164
2 things to fix in CMIS's PeeringDB record, from what its exchanges publish: 1 to add, 1 to correct. As of 2026-10-08 22:13 UTC.
Make the changes on CMIS's PeeringDB page: sign in, choose Edit, and find the exchanges under Public Peering Exchange Points. Speeds go in as megabits per second.
Add these exchanges (1)
On the exchange's own member list, but not in CMIS's PeeringDB record. Add one entry per connection with these values.
-
Peering.cz Prague, Bratislava, Vienna, Frankfurt, Czechia · PeeringDB 713From its IX-F export and website members list2 connections, so 2 entries:
IPv4 185.0.20.91 IPv6 2001:7f8:7f::91 Speed 2625 Mbps (2.625G) RS peer Yes IPv4 185.0.20.93 IPv6 2001:7f8:7f::93 Speed 2625 Mbps (2.625G) RS peer Yes
Correct these entries (1)
Addresses or port speeds in PeeringDB that differ from the exchange's IX-F export. The changes below follow the export; if the export is the one that's wrong, tell the exchange instead.
-
Problem PeeringDB has The export has IPv6 address missing from PeeringDB none 2001:7f8:14::49:1 2001:7f8:14::49:2 Port speed differs 2 × 20G 20G - In the entry with IPv4 91.210.17.39: set IPv6 to 2001:7f8:14::49:1 (now empty).
- In the entry with IPv4 91.210.17.49: set IPv6 to 2001:7f8:14::49:2 (now empty).
PeeringDB's IX-F import is on for this exchange and this network allows automatic updates, so PeeringDB should make this change by itself. If it hasn't, PeeringDB may have hit a conflict: check the IX-F suggestions on the network's PeeringDB page.
From ixreport.com/net/204949/: PeeringDB against each exchange's IX-F export and website members list. Exchanges whose lists couldn't be read on this update aren't included.