POM-IX: operator report
Gdańsk, Poland · PeeringDB 4480 · ixreport.com/ix/4480/report/
Members of POM-IX that PeeringDB has wrong, from its IX-F export (14 networks, read 2026-10-08 20:54 UTC) and its website members list (13 networks, read 2026-10-08 20:54 UTC), against PeeringDB as of 2026-10-08 20:58 UTC. 6 networks to follow up; 2 with a public PeeringDB contact.
Contacts are the networks' public PeeringDB contacts: the peering (policy) contact where there is one, else technical, then NOC. Networks keep these themselves on PeeringDB.
On your lists, missing from PeeringDB (5)
These networks could add POM-IX to their PeeringDB record. Networks with no PeeringDB record would need to create one first.
| Network | On your | Addresses | Contact |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS29649 Limes sp. z o.o. | IX-F and website | 185.0.16.69 10G |
No public contact |
| AS51976 AS51976 | website | – | No PeeringDB record |
| AS60191 Nowatel | IX-F and website | 185.0.16.75 10G |
NOC: email address (needs JavaScript) +48587272020 |
| AS198881 GetResponse | IX-F and website | 185.0.16.77 10G |
No PeeringDB record |
| AS207217 HAWE CDN | website | – | Policy: email address (needs JavaScript) +48618614935 |
Addresses or port speeds that differ (1)
PeeringDB against your IX-F export, for the 11 networks in both. Either the network's PeeringDB record or the export is out of date.
| Network | Problem | PeeringDB has | Your export has | Contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS41297 ABAKS | Port speed differs | 2 × 10G | 10G | No public contact |
In PeeringDB, not on your lists (0)
Either your lists are missing these networks, or they've left and their PeeringDB record is out of date.
None.