ixreport

BéarnIX: operator report

Pau, France · PeeringDB 3384 · ixreport.com/ix/3384/report/

Download CSV

Members of BéarnIX that PeeringDB has wrong, from its IX-F export (11 networks, read 2026-10-08 22:05 UTC) and its website members list (11 networks, read 2026-10-08 22:05 UTC), against PeeringDB as of 2026-10-08 22:13 UTC. 2 networks to follow up.

Contacts are the networks' public PeeringDB contacts: the peering (policy) contact where there is one, else technical, then NOC. Networks keep these themselves on PeeringDB.

On your lists, missing from PeeringDB (2)

These networks could add BéarnIX to their PeeringDB record. Networks with no PeeringDB record would need to create one first.

NetworkOn yourAddressesContact
AS198239 NanoXion PeeringDBIX-F and website 185.1.169.16
2001:7f8:f4::19:8239:1
1G
No public contact
AS205690 Cyber Azerty ClubIX-F and website 185.1.169.30
185.1.169.31
2001:7f8:f4::20:5690:1
2001:7f8:f4::20:5690:2
2 × 1G
No PeeringDB record

Addresses or port speeds that differ (0)

PeeringDB against your IX-F export, for the 9 networks in both. Either the network's PeeringDB record or the export is out of date.

None: every network's addresses and port speed match.

In PeeringDB, not on your lists (0)

Either your lists are missing these networks, or they've left and their PeeringDB record is out of date.

None.